Evaluating Art Throughout The Ages Essay

Throughout the memoir of art, evaluation of nice races has continued even long after the artists lifetimetime. This is beca usage the proper evaluation of any work of art involves an understanding of its ethnical and historical context, its philosophy and the message the artist tries to convey. Although beauty (aesthetics) used to be an important component of art evaluation, post-modern and abstract art have delegated it to obscurity. (Schaeffer) downstairs are some criteria relevant to evaluating art from any period of history 1. Technical quality and brilliance These consist of form (structure and expression), contrast (separation of fair game from background in many instances), texture, colour display or the use of lines (in line art), composition of various objects in the artwork and quality of craftsmanship. 2. chaste integrity and vision Artists should remain true to their publicview and to themselves.This means not entirely uniqueness and originality, but also remai ning committed to the ideal and panache he is trying to depict. 3. Philosophy and world view This is often referred to the works hidden meaning, and the values it represents. E. g. in prehistoric cave art, the world view would often be related to the day-to-day wish period of bountiful hunting. Salvador Dalis artistic philosophy was based on surrealism ( tie picture ), which often had a dream- ilk quality. 4.Relation to the artists lifes work, its genre and period in history Many of these qualities cannot be completely evaluated during the artists life time, and may require epoch-making periods of time after its completion. In many cases it is never complete e. g. masterpieces like the Mona Lisa continue to be evaluated, centuries after it was finished.Reference Schaeffer Francis (1978). Art and the Bible. Figure. Salvador Dalis woolgather of a Virgin depicts his surrealistic philosophy, and a dream state.