Aust Prohibition Act :: essays research papers

mixed international treaties and conventions (e.g. International Narcotics Control Board), has provided Australia with guidelines and regulatory measures that the Commonwealth goernment must(prenominal) put into action inwardly the criminal justice system. Australia became a array of significant treaties and conventions to uphold strong every(prenominal)iances with other nations (Such as the U.S.). The prep ardness of Australian Governments to sign these various treaties, and modify domestic drug laws accordingly, seems largely to pass water been a function of the countrys subordinate status on the world stage, and its desire to be seen as a good international citizen, rather than being driven by concern in spite of appearance Australia rough the conundrums posed by illicit drugs (Brereton, D. 200090).The Act or drug laws within particular treaties and/or convention was based on basic offenses much(prenominal) as (to name a few), cultivation, possession, trafficking, and s upply.The need for such drug laws was however, a consequence for external development, non so much required in Australia. Countries such as the U.S. prompted such regulation and seem to hold greater power in pushing these developments forward.A number of concerns have arisen over the last decade into reasons why certain drug policies have been passed within National and International boarders. To help and explain how prohibition became the only pith of limiting drug use and regulation of drugs.Drug use was seen to outgrowth public costs and deduct time and profit from employers and within bon ton according to certain governments. The economic argument centres on the profits to be made by the sellers on the one hand and the losses preserve by employers of users and/or society in general (Brown, Farrier, Egger and McNamara. 20011070). This suggests that not only would drug use be seen as a problem within State and National boarders, but also internationally. Therefore it was belie ved that if all Commonwealth government were under the same treaties and/or convention this would lessen the use of Psychotropic substances, and also, deter drug trafficking, supply and demand.Another historic factor that increased prohibition of only certain drugs within industrialised Western Countries was argued by Brown et al (20011071) we can derive a powerful and historically sustainable argument that those drugs which are currently reasoned in Western Countries are those in which there is an indigenous record both of use and capital investment, while those which are illegal are those which are produced in Third World Countries, where the costs of use trump the profit to be to be made.