Does King Lear Play The Tragic :: essays research papers

Does King Lear Play the sadal Hero, or the Autocrat?It is quite possible to make an argument in favour of either answer, an argument that would prove to be quite a study, although one answer would weigh in favour of the other. To prove this, real elements would have to be analysed thoroughly, all aspects taken into context and sufficient inquiry done into the matter. This is the only method in which a fair debate of the argument can be taken into consideration.We can only call up the answer to this question if we know what the two arguments mean this will stick out a solid base onto which the rest of the debate can rest, a foundation of fact. Aristotle, a great founder of the definition of calamity apply the word catharsis to describe the government issues of true tragedy on the spectator. Aristotle stated that the purpose of tragedy was to invoke pity and terror, and thereby effect the catharsis of these emotions. Other critics see tragedy as a honourable lesson in which attention and pity are excited by the tragic virtuoso&8217s fate serve to warn the spectator non to similarly tempt providence. This interpretation is generally accepted that through with(predicate) experiencing fear vicariously in a controlled situation, the spectators own anxieties are directed outward, and, through sympathetic identification was the protagonist, his insight and outlook are enlarged.Also, as importantly and significantly, Aristotle introduced the term hamartia, the tragic flaw, or an inherent defect or blemish in the hero of a tragedy. Aristotle casually described the tragic hero as a man of noble rank and nature whose mishap is not brought upon him by villainy or corruption, but by more or less error of judgement. This imperfection later became known, or interpreted as a moral flaw, although most great tragedies defy such a elementary distinction of the term. We could say that in many cases of tragedy the hero is neer passive, but struggles to resolve h is tragic difficulty with an obsessive dedication, that he is blamable of presuming that he is godlike, attempting to surpass his own human limitations.The need, or lack of enunciate in a society, could be a reason why the tragedy came to be, and is known in Greek terms as hubris. This ethical and spiritual thought portrays the resulting implications of impious disregard of the limits governing human action in an orderly universe. It is the sin to which the great and the gifted are most susceptible, and in Greek tragedy is usually the hero&8217s tragic flaw.