Three Estates :: Essays Papers

Three Estates The term Three Estates is used to describe the divisions of the European parliament. parliament is defined by the Websters Dictionary as, an assemblage of person (as members of nobility, clergy, and commons) called in concert by the British sovereign setting for a period of m and then being dissolved, and constituting the supreme legislature body of the United Kingdom. sevens could in addition be defined as, The image and the thing in deed of the mixed party (Alford 36). The three different groups as mentioned in the definition by the Websters Dictionary are the estates that divide the parliament. The estates are non of physical property, provided rather the separation of the society. One group was the clergy, which consisted of the bishops and priests, who were also called the prayers. Next in that respect was the group of nobility which was formed by the kings, queens and knights, as so known as the fighters. And finally, the last group was the group of commons which were the fairish person such as the workers. The term three estates showed the fundamental stance of the separation of society in medieval times. This term Three Estates does non necessarily mean the three divisions of the parliament. This term could be, as more legal synonym for both houses . (Alford 36) The two houses are the business firm of the Lords and the House of the Commons. This shows that the term is not a direct interpretation , but rather an idea of the separation. fantan was used to manage the Crowns business (Loades 90). The parliament was also used to reach bills and legislature, but each time a bill was presented, it was mandatory that it would go through each house at least three times. As the age of the fantan became older, its procedures grew more sophisticated, and more strictly enforced. (Loades 92) The Parliament also became a place at which provided a very good political platform for a monarch who wanted to say someth ing of particular importance. (Loades 93) But the Parliament did also have its faults. It had a separation between the House of Lords and the House of Commons. The House of the Lords was closer to the court, highly spiritual, and made themselves to the hand of the monarch.