Essay --

With the development of technologies, Cyber Attacks have been increased rapidly in the past some years. Probability of causing damage to critical state infrastructure uniform nuclear or defense mechanism system, air traffic control, other governmental institutions, business and citizens leads to the problematic issue of its attribution, which is being highly debated in world(prenominal) Law. This phrase by Nicholas Tsagourias makes contribution in that debate and revolves around the query of ascription of cyber- set ons as an armed attack and the safe of self defense by the victim state in response to such attacks. However, the natural law of war requires that the cyber-attack must be attributed before a counterattack is permitted. This Article critically evaluates different obstacles of attribution like anonymity (determination of attackers identity), attack from different jurisdictions, and presentation of evidence in order to enjoyment the right of self defense by throwin g the light on confused political, technical and legal aspects.ContextArticle 51 preserves the right of individual or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs... Therefore, the right of self defense can be exercised when an issue becomes mingled and reaches to a particular level of intensity between states or a state and organized and identified group, which may result into injuries of individuals and destruction of objects and properties. but in cyber-attack, chances are less to cause immediate human injuries. The source of the article provides brief detail on some important issues for display case how to deal with a cyber-attack by a non-state actor. So this essay emphasizes that Cyber warfare laws require more development and a proper framework because states may fea... ... the response of armed attack, Burdon of proof and the state control over its entities. transnational Court of Justice in Nicaragua Cas holds that a state is liable for the actions of paramili taries or non-State actors only if the actors in question act in complete dependance on the state. Whereas the opposing overall control standard set by in Prosecutor v. Tadic which holds that where a State has a role in organizing, coordinating, and providing support for a group, the groups acts are attributable to the State. international Law has different view on burden of proof. ICJ has made literary criticism on the concept of overall control because there was no rough-and-ready control by the Serbian government over the acts took place. Its finding regarding the blameworthiness of Serbia was, Serbias guilt must be proven beyond each doubt, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt.